Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney says that the reason America's Big Three automakers have bounced back since the recession is due to bankruptcy, not bailouts.
In an interview Friday with the CBS Early Show, Romney repeated the stance he took in a 2008 op-ed piece in the New York Times at the height of the bailout talks - that filing bankruptcy is a responsible step to take when faced with financial hardship.
"The right process for an enterprise in trouble is not to be given free money from the taxpayers with a bailout, but instead go through a bankruptcy process, reorganize debts, and reduce costs and come out stronger," Romney told CBS's Erica Hill Friday.
Of the three major Detroit automakers, General Motors and Chrysler both filed Chapter 11 bankruptcies in 2009. Both also received bailouts from the U.S. Government, funded by tax payers. Only Ford survived the recession without turning to bankruptcy or receiving a bailout, and instead secured a line of credit to help them bridge the recession's gap in sales.
So how did bankruptcy help Detroit? While bankruptcy can be complex, especially for corporations, it offers a very clear benefit: a reorganization of debts into a more affordable plan. In the case of a Chapter 11, business can also renegotiate contracts, sell off unnecessary assets, receive some debt forgiveness, and reorganize as a new business entity. This is typically favored over Chapter 7 bankruptcy, as it allows the business to stay in operation during and after the bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy allowed GM and Chrysler to shed off the obligations that were keeping them from being truly innovative, and reorganize as a new entity that could focus on a successful future, Romney argues. And while the two automakers did receive bailout funds, having gone through bankruptcy first left them in a better position to capitalize on the investment by taxpayers. Both GM and Chrysler have repaid significant portions of the bailouts.
Romney also takes credit for the situation, saying that his 2008 New York Times piece convinced Obama to hold off on an immediate bailout.
"So I'm very proud of the fact that, in fact, we called it like it was, and that is these companies needed to go through a bankruptcy process, come out through bankruptcy, go back to work, get jobs for the people who had would otherwise have lost jobs if these companies just trailed on down," he told CBS.
"And by the way, we could have saved billions of dollars had we moved to bankruptcy from the very beginning."
